Archive for the Uncategorized Category

U.S. Border Security

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

U.S. Border Security under investigation by Channel 2 WSBTV’s Justin Farmer, Atlanta, GA. What he uncovers is a revealing look into who is crossing our southern border – OTM’s (other than Mexicans).

View Video – Part 1

Part 2 can be obtained by cllicking “Channel 2 Investigates U.S. Border Security Part 2″ listed on the Part 1 page. (I would have added the URL here but it’s embedded in Flash.)

 

ReadBorder Threat List Surprises Georgia Congressman

 

LIST: People Captured In The Last 2 Years- download pdfs

Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4

Posted via web from Denise Scott Jackson

U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

(Reuters) – The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto.

The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush’s administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the United States would support the talks as long as the negotiating forum, the so-called Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty, "operates under the rules of consensus decision-making."

"Consensus is needed to ensure the widest possible support for the Treaty and to avoid loopholes in the Treaty that can be exploited by those wishing to export arms irresponsibly," Clinton said in a written statement.

While praising the Obama administration’s decision to overturn the Bush-era policy and to proceed with negotiations to regulate conventional arms sales, some groups criticized the U.S. insistence that decisions on the treaty be unanimous.

"The shift in position by the world’s biggest arms exporter is a major breakthrough in launching formal negotiations at the United Nations in order to prevent irresponsible arms transfers," Amnesty International and Oxfam International said in a joint statement.

However, they said insisting that decisions on the treaty be made by consensus "could fatally weaken a final deal."

"Governments must resist US demands to give any single state the power to veto the treaty as this could hold the process hostage during the course of negotiations. We call on all governments to reject such a veto clause," said Oxfam International’s policy adviser Debbie Hillier.

The proposed legally binding treaty would tighten regulation of, and set international standards for, the import, export and transfer of conventional weapons.

Supporters say it would give worldwide coverage to close gaps in existing regional and national arms export control systems that allow weapons to pass onto the illicit market.

Nations would remain in charge of their arms export control arrangements but would be legally obliged to assess each export against criteria agreed under the treaty. Governments would have to authorize transfers in writing and in advance.

The main opponent of the treaty in the past was the U.S. Bush administration, which said national controls were better. Last year, the United States accounted for more than two-thirds of some $55.2 billion in global arms transfer deals.

Arms exporters China, Russia <http://www.reuters.com/places/russia>  and Israel abstained last year in a U.N. vote on the issue.

The proposed treaty is opposed by conservative U.S. think tanks like the Heritage Foundation, which said last month that it would not restrict the access of "dictators and terrorists" to arms but would be used to reduce the ability of democracies such as Israel to defend their people.

The U.S. lobbying group the National Rifle Association has also opposed the treaty.

A resolution before the U.N. General Assembly is sponsored by seven nations including major arms exporter Britain. It calls for preparatory meetings in 2010 and 2011 for a conference to negotiate a treaty in 2012.

(Editing by Eric Beech)



KEY IN ON THIS: “The proposed legally binding treaty would tighten regulation of, and set international standards for, the import, export and transfer of conventional weapons”.

  The import, export and transfer of conventional weapons is key to what our government is talking about. Conventional is not military. The firearms that we use are for personal protection, hunting and sport!

I for one am not willing to give up the numerous firearms I own.

D

Posted via email from Denise Scott Jackson

Maxine Waters Uses the “S” Word

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

(2477 KB)
Watch on posterous

This video clip shows Congresswoman Maxine Waters discussing drilling for new oil reserves. She explains, in a slip of the tongue, what this whole discussion is all about. (Take note of the reaction of the people around her.)
This is about as blatant as a Liberal can get. What she said was the truth, accidentally, but notice that when she realized what she revealed to the public and the news media, it stopped her dead in her tracks – for a very long period of time. Unfortunately it was too late.

Posted via email from Denise Scott Jackson

RED WINGS vs COYOTES GAME 7

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

I’ve been to lots of games before and have loved them all, but Game 7 last Tuesday was really special. Seeing my Wings win a deciding game on the other team’s home ice, well it just doesn’t get any better than that! The Wings broke a 46 year draught by beating out the Coyotes. The Red Wings haven’t won a Game 7 on the road since their 1964 victory at Chicago in the opening round.

Cheers to my Wings…looking forward to this second round of play beginning tonight in San Jose. GO WINGS!

All my photos from Game 7 can be found here > http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=2061573&id=1268443501&l=bf1d1a9a55[[posterous-content:pid___0]]

Posted via web from Denise Scott Jackson

GET THE SPAM OUT

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Steps to preventing spam:

  • Keep your PC’s anti-virus software up-to-date and install a firewall. Unprotected high-speed Internet connections are vulnerable to infection by viruses that are programmed to open gateways, also known as proxies, to relay spam. By not keeping your PC secure, you may unwittingly be a courier for spam.  


  • Give your primary e-mail address to friends and family only. Give a different e-mail to others on the Internet. Although this second address will likely receive unwanted e-mails, it is more disposable and can allow you to better control the e-mails you receive.  

   

  • Do not post your primary e-mail address in newsgroups, bulletin boards or chat rooms. Spammers use software programs, often referred to as spiders or bots, to search for and harvest e-mail addresses on public forums. To prevent this, use a secondary e-mail address or alter the primary address so that it is not deliverable in that format. For example, if your e-mail address is test_account@comcast.net, you could post it as test_account@NO.SPAM.comcast.net or "test _ account at comcast dot net".  


  • Do not post your primary e-mail address on a Web site. Spiders also scan Web sites for e-mail addresses. You can alter your e-mail address to help protect it but remember that e-mail harvesting software can read HTML code, so be sure to remove the "mailto:" tag.  


  • Do not reply to unsolicited e-mails. If the e-mail does not appear to be from a trustworthy or legitimate source, delete it without replying. A federal anti-spam law called The Can Spam Act, went into effect January 1, 2004, requiring a functioning "opt out" link or a legitimate "reply to unsubscribe" e-mail address. Some unscrupulous spammers have ignored this law and continue to trick recipients into unwittingly responding to a fake "opt out" link, which actually verifies their e-mail address as a valid one. Therefore, it is still strongly recommended that recipients of unsolicited e-mail carefully consider whether an "opt out" or "reply to unsubscribe" seems legitimate and act accordingly.  


  • Consider using an alternate e-mail address when signing up for services, filling out forms or taking surveys on the Internet. Read the privacy policy of these sites. Keep in mind, if the service is "free" they often need to generate revenue in some manner and advertising is often used to do this.  


  • When signing up for a mailing list, read the terms and policies. Signing up should result in wanted or solicited e-mail, but the list provider should disclose whether signing up will result in the sale or trade of your e-mail address to other parties.  


  • Let friends and family know that you do not wish to have them share your e-mail address.  


  • Make sure your e-mail address is difficult to guess. Don’t use a common name or common words. It is not uncommon for spammers to use software programs to generate random user names based on common names and words in the dictionary. In addition, common e-mail addresses may have been used previously and my still be on old mailing lists.  


  • Check "sent mail" folders for suspicious messages. Take responsibility for your PC by checking your "sent mail" folder regularly to ensure that all sent mail is really being sent by you and not by a spammer using an open gateway (proxy) on your computer.

Posted via email from Denise Scott Jackson

NINE WORDS WOMEN USE

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

 


(1) Fine: This is the word women use to end an argument when they are right and you need to shut up.
(2) Five Minutes: If she is getting dressed, this means a half an hour. Five minutes is only five minutes if you have just been given five more minutes to watch the game before helping around the house.
(3) Nothing: This is the calm before the storm. This means something, and you should be on your toes. Arguments that begin with nothing usually end in fine.
(4) Go Ahead: This is a dare, not permission. Don’t Do It!
(5) Loud Sigh: This is
actually a word, but is a non-verbal statement often misunderstood by men. A loud sigh means she thinks you are an idiot and wonders why she is wasting her time standing here and arguing with you about nothing. (Refer back to # 3 for the meaning of nothing.)

(6) That’s Okay: This is one of the most dangerous statements a women can make to a man. That’s okay means she wants to think long and hard before deciding how and when you will pay for your mistake.
(7) Thanks: A woman is thanking you, do not question, or faint. Just say you’re welcome. (I want to add in a clause here – This is true, unless she says ‘Thanks a lot’ – that is PURE sarcasm and she is not thanking you at all. DO NOT say ‘you’re welcome’ . That will bring on a ‘whatever’).
(8) Whatever: Is a woman’s way of saying F– YOU!
(9) Don’t worry about it, I got it: Another dangerous
statement, meaning this is something that a woman has told a man to do several times, but is now doing it herself. This will later result in a man asking ‘What’s wrong?’ For the woman’s response refer to # 3.

Posted via email from Denise Scott Jackson

Is Obama Poised to Cede US Sovereignty?

Posted in Life, Politics, Uncategorized | No Comments »

This is very scary if it’s true!

On October 14, Lord Christopher Monckton gave a presentation in St. Paul, MN on the subject of global warming. In this 4-minute excerpt from his speech, he issues a dire warning to all Americans regarding the United Nations Climate Change Treaty that is scheduled to be signed in Copenhagen in December 2009.

A draft of the treaty can be read here:

http://www.globalclimatescam.com/docu…

Chuck Norris has an article in WorldNetDaily with a good analysis of the treaty:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE….

There has been considerable debate raised about Monckton’s conclusion that the Copenhagen Treaty would cede US sovereignty. His comments appear to be based upon his interpretation of the The Supremacy Clause in the US Constitution (Article VI, paragraph 2). This clause establishes the Constitution, Federal Statutes, and U.S. TREATIES as the supreme law of the land. Concerns have been raised in the past that a particularly ambitious treaty may supersede the US Constitution. In the 1950s, a constitutional amendment, known as the Bricker Amendment, was proposed in response to such fears, but it failed to pass. You can read more about the Bricker Amendment in a 1953 Time Magazine article:

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/art…,9171,806676-1,00.html

Lord Monckton served as a policy adviser to Margaret Thatcher. He has repeatedly challenged Al Gore to a debate to which Gore has refused. Monckton sued to stop Gore’s film “An Inconvenient Truth” from being shown in British schools due to its inaccuracies. The judge found in-favor of Monckton, ordering 9 serious errors in the film to be corrected. Lord Monckton travels internationally in an attempt to educate the public about the myth of global warming.

UPDATE:

Check-out this story from the 10/29/09 Wall Street Journal:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001…

God’s Miracle Racheal

Posted in Family, Life, Uncategorized | No Comments »

Here’s a piece WZZM 13 did reporting on H1N1, and the miracle God performed which saved my niece Rachael.

Rachael

STANDING GUARD

Posted in Life, Uncategorized, military | No Comments »

When I was growing up my father taught me the meaning of respect. Being a Marine, he had a different perspective then some of the other father’s – it was “his way” or the “highway.” And, although I never tested him, I think he may have given me the boot if I had dared to disrespect the flag or our great country.

My father was an outstanding man; stern but loving. I lost him to cancer 9 years ago after a 6-month battle. He was head-strong to the end, determined to have the dignity he deserved and was sure he had earned!

I have many fond memories during the time I took care of him, but one morning, just before he died, really stands out. I walked into his room that morning and he looked up at me, signaled toward the end of his bed and stated, “Denise, make sure those two Marines have everything they need.” I said “which Marines daddy?”…”the two standing guard at the end of my bed!” Although I did not see them, I’m absolutely sure my father did.

It wasn’t long after that the Lord took my dad home. I think of this story from time-to-time and smile, knowing it would be just like God to send two Angles who looked like Marines in Dress Blues, to escort him home.

I guess I remember this story for a couple of reasons; not just because of the “Angel Marines” but because they were “standing guard.” This is something I remember from a family trip to Arlington – the Old Guard standing watch over the graves of the Unknown Soldiers.

Those soldiers who stood guard amazed me. They epitomized what my father tried to instill in us, his children. Beyond their training, what fascinated me, and left such a lasting impression, was their dedication to duty. I began to research the Tomb and its guardians.

The Sentinels for the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier are hand picked and rigorously trained. They come from across the country and from every walk of life: they are men and women. For some it’s their first unit in the Army, for others they have served many years. This duty is not for everyone, over 80% of the soldiers who tryout fail.

Each soldier has a strong military bearing, is disciplined, possesses great stamina and presents an outstanding soldierly appearance in the Army Blue Uniform. Each Sentinel must be able to flawlessly perform seven different types of walks, honors and ceremonies. They must retain vast amounts of knowledge concerning the Tomb, Arlington National Cemetery, the United States Army and their unit.

There are many urban myths circulating about the Tomb Guards. For instance they must commit 2 years of life to guard the Tomb, live in a barracks under the Tomb, and cannot drink any alcohol on or off duty for the rest of their lives. Nor can they watch TV or talk to anyone for the first six months of duty as a guard.

Actually there is NO set time for service. The average tour at the Tomb is about a year. The Sentinels live either in a barracks on Ft. Myer (the Army post located adjacent to the cemetery) or off base if they like. They do have living quarters under the steps of the amphitheater where they stay during their 24 hour shifts. But when they are off duty, they are off, this includes being able to watch TV and drink if they are of legal age.

My personal favourite myths are that the Sentinels cannot swear in public for the rest of their lives. And they cannot disgrace the uniform (i.e. fighting) or the Tomb in any way – were they to do so the Wreath lapel pin (awarded after two years of service) would be revoked. All off duty time is spent studying the 175 notable people laid to rest in Arlington National Cemetery.

The truth is that the Tomb Guard Identification Badge is awarded after the Sentinel passes a series of tests. The Badge is permanently awarded after a Sentinel has served 9 months as a Sentinel at the Tomb. Over 500 badges have been awarded since its creation in the late 1950’s. And while the Badge can be revoked, the offense must be such that it discredits the Tomb. Revocation is at the Regimental Commander’s discretion. (You can drink a beer and even swear and still keep the Badge.) The Badge is a full size award, worn on the right pocket of the uniform jacket, NOT a lapel pin.

All this information is significant to those who serve(d), perhaps their family, and fewer yet, civilians. For me, I wanted to emphasize a point, that to those who “Stand Guard” – whether it be Soldiers, Marines or Angels – you make a difference. Your commitment IS significant.

Thank you dad for your many years of service to your Country; to the wonderful upbringing you provided me, and for all the mentoring. I feel blessed to have known you and, doubly blessed to have been able to call you “father”.

On this Veterans Day I want to remember and thank, our serving and retired military men and women for their service. And offer my deepest, sincere, gratitude to those who gave their lives. I thank God for them and their remarkable commitment to their job – keeping the United States of America and its citizen’s safe. I thank God for my freedom afforded to me by these men and women, may I never take the freedom I hold so dear for granted. May I never disregard the great sacrifice these soldiers and Marines make – both in their service and with their lives.

Posted via email from Denise Scott Jackson

NO IMPACT MAN

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

NO IMPACT MAN

Author Colin Beavan (No Impact Man, Fingerprints, Operation Jedburgh), in research for his new book, began the No Impact Project in November 2006. A newly self-proclaimed environmentalist who could no longer avoid pointing the finger at himself, Colin leaves behind his liberal complacency for a vow to make as little environmental impact as possible for one year. No more automated transportation, no more electricity, no more non-local food, no more material consumption…no problem. That is, until his espresso-guzzling, retail-worshipping wife Michelle Conlin and their two-year-old daughter Isabella are dragged into the fray. Filmmakers Laura Gabbert and Justin Schein provide a front row seat into the familial strains and strengthened bonds that result from Colin’s and Michelle’s struggle with this radical lifestyle change.

Directed by: Laura Gabbert & Justin Schein
Running Time: 90 minutes
Origin: USA
MPAA Rating: Not Rated

Posted via web from Denise Scott Jackson